Are State Psychiatric Hospitals Being Transformed into the New Jails and Prisons?
The transformation of jails and prisons into America’s
mental hospitals for people with mental illness was pointed out in 1992 by the
National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) and the Public Citizen’s Health
Research Group and was the topic of the 2005 Public Broadcasting System
Frontline special, The New Asylums. In 2006, the Bureau of Justice Statistics reported
that more than half of all prison and jail inmates had mental health problems
with jail inmates having the highest rate of mental illness (64%). In 2014, the
Treatment Advocacy Center reiterated, “Prisons
and jails have become America’s new asylums” and reported that a 2012 study
found ten times as many people with
mental illness in jails and prisons as there were in state psychiatric
hospitals.
Although alarming, these statistics do not fully capture the
dark underside of the problem for those individuals that are utilizing mental
health services. The majority of
patients now treated at state psychiatric hospitals has changed. It
make little sense to do a simple comparison of the number of persons with
serious mental illness being held in jails and prisons to with the number of
persons being treated in our state psychiatric hospitals when a growing number of
the hospitalized patients are there for forensic reasons.
Wik, Hollen, and Fisher (2019) reported that mental health
officials are concerned about the impact of the rising number of forensic
patients that are present within the state psychiatric hospitals. They note
that responses from forensic directors maintained by the National Association
of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute show a 76% increase
in the number of forensic patients in state psychiatric hospitals nationally
between the years of 1999 and 2014. They
found that state psychiatric hospitals are spending approximately one-third of
their budgets on forensic patients. As the hospital population trends towards
serving more individuals that are court involved the shift continues towards
increased spending on forensic patients and a proportionate decrease in
spending on civil patients.
In Georgia, the number of clinical beds have slowly
decreased as the number of forensic beds have increased to the point that
forensic units now dominate the mental health services at the state psychiatric
hospitals. Approximately 60% of the hospital beds are now being
used for forensic purposes and another 40-bed forensic unit is being built. However, no new clinical beds are under
construction. The majority of the
forensic beds are for persons who lack competency to stand trial, with the rest
of these beds for persons found insane at the time of the crime. Forensic patients on the competency units at
the hospital are kept there just long
enough to restore their competency to stand trial and not until they are
mentally healthy enough to return to society.
Considering the large number of persons with serious
mentally illness who are now incarcerated or homeless, it is doubtful that the
state hospitals are giving up beds to forensic patients because they have
become more efficient at treating mental illness. Although the closing of many inpatient
hospital services in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s was due to court rulings
following genuine concern about the welfare of persons with mental illness, the cost of hospitalization appears to be a
leading factor driving the reduction in clinical beds. In Georgia jails, the cost often varies from
$45 to $85 dollars per day per inmate; but in Georgia psychiatric hospitals, the
cost can be $500 or more per day per patient.
If all persons with serious mentally illness were transferred to state
psychiatric hospitals, a massive increase in funding would be needed to keep
the mental health system from bankruptcy.
The main protection from further
funding cuts, unfortunately, may be the state psychiatric hospital’s role in the
criminal justice system.
Without a doubt, the role of state psychiatric hospitals in
evaluating and restoring competency to stand trial, doing criminal
responsibility evaluations, and caring for those found insane is extremely
important and should continue. However, forensic service should not be provided at
the expense of regular clinical services.
The proportion of a state’s psychiatric budget being spent on serving
the criminal justice system compared to providing treatment for persons with serious
mental illness should be ready available for public scrutiny. The fact that jails and prisons in this
country have largely become the asylums of 21st century is a tragedy. However,
it is also important to expose and resist the forces that are transforming our
state psychiatry hospitals into the new jails and prisons of the 21st
century.
Comments
Post a Comment